Graydon Head
THIS IS AN ADVERTISEMENT

Blog: Jack "Out of the Box"

Welcome to Jack "Out of the Box." This is a spin-off of the Firm's InfoLaw Newsletter, much like "CSI: Miami" is a spin-off from "CSI." Except without all the corpses. I plan to update the blog at least weekly. Really. It's not like when I used to promise my mom to clean my room once a week. I'm more mature now. And of course, the InfoLaw Newsletter will continue every two weeks. The blog will feature shorter pieces, and ideally, reader feedback. Should be fun. Oh yeah, and informative.

George Zimmerman Still Standing His Ground

Jul 16, 2013
Now that he’s won an acquittal on second degree murder charges, George Zimmerman may be headed back to court. But this time it will be on the civil side, and he will be on offense, rather than defense.

You may recall that back in March 2012, NBC broadcast on the Today show an edited version of Zimmerman’s comments to a police dispatcher. The edited version went like this:

Zimmerman: This guy looks like he’s up to no good. He looks black.

But the actual recording was this:

Zimmerman: This guy looks like he’s up to no good. Or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around, looking about.

D
ispatcher: OK, and this guy — is he black, white or Hispanic?

Zimmerman: He looks black.

The edited version makes Zimmerman look like a committed racial profiler. The complete version, not so much.

Zimmerman filed a lawsuit against NBC back in December, but the civil case has been on hold pending the outcome of the criminal case. And that illustrates some important aspects of libel law. A libel plaintiff has to establish several elements. The statement has to be false. But it also must be defamatory in nature. When my mom told everyone she ever met I was the smartest student in my law school class it was patently false, but I couldn’t sue her for defamation.

And that brings us to element 3 – the statement has to harm the plaintiff’s reputation. In Zimmerman’s case, the acquittal was key to his ability to proceed with the libel suit. Had he been convicted for murder, he would have had a tough time arguing that the Today show broadcast did any additional harm to his reputation.

Now Zimmerman’s case lives on. And NBC once again manages to find itself in a high profile libel suit. Olympic bombing suspect Richard Jewell got $500,000 from the network based on its reporting on his case in 1996. We’ll see if history repeats itself here.

Comment

  1.    
     
     
      
       
Connect on Facebook

Get Linkedin with Jack

Follow Me

Info/Law
Federal Trade Commission
Rebecca Tushnet's 43 (B)log
Pittsburgh Trademark Lawyer

Do You Know Jack?

READER COMMENTS
(what's the point of a blog without them)
We'd love to hear what you're thinking. Although we can't guarantee that we'll post every question or comment on our site, please note that when you submit a question or comment we assume we've got your consent to post it on our site. To add a comment on any post, just click on "go comment" immediately below that post.

LEGAL DISCLAIMER
(you had to see this coming):
This blog is a periodic publication of Graydon Head & Ritchey LLP and should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only, and you are urged to consult your own advisor concerning your situation and any specific legal question you may have. Many states, including Kentucky, require that law firms add the statement "THIS IS AN ADVERTISEMENT" on publications of this nature.

Copyright © 2014 Graydon Head & Ritchey LLP. All Rights Reserved.