Graydon Head
THIS IS AN ADVERTISEMENT

Blog: Jack "Out of the Box"

Do you read Jack-out-of-the-Box regularly? Do you think other lawyers should know about us?

Nominations are now being accepted for the American Bar Association’s 8th Annual Blawg 100, their annual list of the 100 best legal blogs.  We’d like to invite you, our loyal readers, to use the link below to submit messages on our behalf. Any nomination is appreciated and some of the best comments will be included in this year’s Blawg 100 coverage. Thanks in advance for your participation.

SUBMIT YOUR COMMENTS HERE

Cute Kid / Ugly Court Fight

Oct 14, 2013

How could this incredibly cute YouTube video land a family in court? When it becomes the subject of a copyright battle. For those hard hearted souls who did not click on the link, the video shows a baby boy sitting in the bathtub splashing the pet dachshund, who keeps sticking its nose over the edge of the tub. The baby boy laughs heartily the entire time. It is adorable. And I don’t use that word very easily, if ever.

Ashley Candler, the boy’s mom, apparently shot the video and uploaded it to YouTube. And not long after that, the laughter stopped. It seems that a woman named Shannon Carter uploaded the video to a separate YouTube channel, claiming not only that she owned the copyright, but that she was the baby’s aunt. Her channel is supported by advertising, which means she makes some money every time someone views it. To date, the video on Carter’s YouTube channel has been viewed nearly 70 million times. 

Candler filed a lawsuit in a California federal court claiming that Carter infringed Candler’s copyright in the video. According to the complaint, Candler notified YouTube about the alleged infringement, and the video came down temporarily. But Carter apparently provided a counter notice, stating under penalty of perjury that she owned the copyright. 

According to Candler, though, there is no way that Carter could have possibly believed she owned the copyright, since she was not the one who shot the video.

Interesting case. If Candler is telling the truth, it sounds like Carter is a compulsive liar. But the case illustrates an important point that bears repeating. A person doesn’t lose copyright protection by posting a video to YouTube. While YouTube gets a license in the video, no one else does. And while it may seem a little counter intuitive that a person can make a video freely available to the world, but still be able to sue someone for re-posting it, that is the law. And if the unauthorized user makes money off of the content, it makes the copyright owner’s case that much stronger.

 

Comment

  1.    
     
     
      
       
Connect on Facebook

Get Linkedin with Jack

Follow Me

Info/Law
Federal Trade Commission
Rebecca Tushnet's 43 (B)log
Pittsburgh Trademark Lawyer

Do You Know Jack?

READER COMMENTS
(what's the point of a blog without them)
We'd love to hear what you're thinking. Although we can't guarantee that we'll post every question or comment on our site, please note that when you submit a question or comment we assume we've got your consent to post it on our site. To add a comment on any post, just click on "go comment" immediately below that post.

LEGAL DISCLAIMER
(you had to see this coming):
This blog is a periodic publication of Graydon Head & Ritchey LLP and should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only, and you are urged to consult your own advisor concerning your situation and any specific legal question you may have. Many states, including Kentucky, require that law firms add the statement "THIS IS AN ADVERTISEMENT" on publications of this nature.

Copyright © 2014 Graydon Head & Ritchey LLP. All Rights Reserved.