Graydon Head

Blog: Jack "Out of the Box"

Welcome to Jack "Out of the Box." This is a spin-off of the Firm's InfoLaw Newsletter, much like "CSI: Miami" is a spin-off from "CSI." Except without all the corpses. I plan to update the blog at least weekly. Really. It's not like when I used to promise my mom to clean my room once a week. I'm more mature now. And of course, the InfoLaw Newsletter will continue every two weeks. The blog will feature shorter pieces, and ideally, reader feedback. Should be fun. Oh yeah, and informative.

Bully Pulpit

Oct 23, 2013

Do cyber bullies have privacy rights? That’s the question posed in an Illinois case where parents of a teenage victim of nasty tweets want Twitter to provide user identification of the people who sent the hateful messages. Rose Martorana-Lollino claims her daughter was the subject of a bullying campaign headed up by whoever is behind the user names @dreadfullyLARGE and @dreadfulFATchic. Tweets include statements like “my passion is being fat” and “hi, my passion is gaining weight.”

Experts contend that Twitter may not be able to comply with the information request due to its own Privacy Policy and the federal Stored Communications Act. Perhaps.  Or perhaps not.

On the Privacy Police issue, it is true that Twitter’s policy says: “We may share or disclose your information at your direction, such as when you authorize a third-party web client or application to access your Twitter account.”  But the same policy also says:

“Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Policy, we may preserve or disclose your information if we believe that it is reasonably necessary to comply with a law, regulation or legal request; to protect the safety of any person; to address fraud, security or technical issues; or to protect Twitter's rights or property.” So is the teenage victim’s safety at issue here? It doesn’t seem like an unreasonable argument. 

And the Stored Communications Act may or may not protect the bullies. That Act protects from disclosure the contents of electronic messages, and limits the availability of customer information. But the Act allows the provider to disclose subscriber information with the “lawful consent of the user.”  So, did the bullies consent to disclosure under the Privacy Policy? Interesting question. If not, the mom may have a tough time. Because while the Act permits disclosure pursuant to court order, it is only in the context of a criminal proceeding. Assuming the mom’s action is civil, the Act seems to prohibit disclosure even if she obtains a court order.

I’m not sure whether there are any Illinois criminal laws that come into play here.  Being cruel is in itself not a crime. I hope the mom is able to get to the bottom of this. I’m all for privacy, but those rights ought to take a back seat when bullies abuse them.


Connect on Facebook

Get Linkedin with Jack

Follow Me

Federal Trade Commission
Rebecca Tushnet's 43 (B)log
Pittsburgh Trademark Lawyer

Do You Know Jack?

(what's the point of a blog without them)
We'd love to hear what you're thinking. Although we can't guarantee that we'll post every question or comment on our site, please note that when you submit a question or comment we assume we've got your consent to post it on our site. To add a comment on any post, just click on "go comment" immediately below that post.

(you had to see this coming):
This blog is a periodic publication of Graydon Head & Ritchey LLP and should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only, and you are urged to consult your own advisor concerning your situation and any specific legal question you may have. Many states, including Kentucky, require that law firms add the statement "THIS IS AN ADVERTISEMENT" on publications of this nature.

Copyright © 2016 Graydon Head & Ritchey LLP. All Rights Reserved.