Graydon Head

Blog: Jack "Out of the Box"

Welcome to Jack "Out of the Box." This is a spin-off of the Firm's InfoLaw Newsletter, much like "CSI: Miami" is a spin-off from "CSI." Except without all the corpses. I plan to update the blog at least weekly. Really. It's not like when I used to promise my mom to clean my room once a week. I'm more mature now. And of course, the InfoLaw Newsletter will continue every two weeks. The blog will feature shorter pieces, and ideally, reader feedback. Should be fun. Oh yeah, and informative.

False LinkedIn Profile Leads to Trademark Claim

Nov 12, 2013
And I thought the legal business was cut throat. Apparently, the software industry is not only brutally competitive, it’s kind of creative.

In a case pending in a Virginia federal court, a software development company called Avepoint alleges that a competitor called Axceler took the concept of competition a little too far. According to Avepoint, Axceler engaged in a plan to discredit Avepoint by leading consumers to believe Avepoint is a Chinese company and its products are manufactured, developed and supported there. None of that is true. Avepoint is a U.S. company and its work is done here.

Here’s the creative part. As part of its plan, Axceler apparently created a LinkedIn profile for a fictious Avepoint software engineer named Jim Chung. According to his profile, Mr. Chung worked in Xinjiang, China. The LinkedIn profile encouraged viewers to contact the fictional Mr. Chung for “business deals,” “new ventures,” and “consulting offers.” According to the lawsuit, Michael Burns, an Axceler employee, tweeted frequently about Chung. Burns sent out one tweet from a conference in Las Vegas that said: “Just ran into jim chung from avePoint good guy.” No indication if Burns also spent time with Manti Teo’s girlfriend.

Avepoint filed a multi-count complaint against Axceler and Burns. Included in the complaint is a count for trademark infringement arising from the phony LinkedIn account. Axceler used Avepoint’s trademark name in the LinkedIn profile, and in Avepoint’s view, for the purpose of misleading the consuming public.

Axceler moved to dismiss the complaint, contending that the LinkedIn profile was not a “use in commerce.” According to their motion, the profile wasn’t an effort to sell a product or service. The court was unimpressed. It noted that “LinkedIn is a website commonly used for advertising and promotion in the software industry.”

Avepoint’s complaint alleged that Axceler was using the Avepoint mark to attract consumers to the LinkedIn Profile and to cause competitive harm. Those allegations were good enough to withstand the motion to dismiss.

The point? If you engineer a truly sleazy plan to “promote” your product at the expense of a competitor, don’t expect to get off on a technicality.


Connect on Facebook

Get Linkedin with Jack

Follow Me

Federal Trade Commission
Rebecca Tushnet's 43 (B)log
Pittsburgh Trademark Lawyer

Do You Know Jack?

(what's the point of a blog without them)
We'd love to hear what you're thinking. Although we can't guarantee that we'll post every question or comment on our site, please note that when you submit a question or comment we assume we've got your consent to post it on our site. To add a comment on any post, just click on "go comment" immediately below that post.

(you had to see this coming):
This blog is a periodic publication of Graydon Head & Ritchey LLP and should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only, and you are urged to consult your own advisor concerning your situation and any specific legal question you may have. Many states, including Kentucky, require that law firms add the statement "THIS IS AN ADVERTISEMENT" on publications of this nature.

Copyright © 2016 Graydon Head & Ritchey LLP. All Rights Reserved.